Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maryville University results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 263 hits . Analysis detected 1,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,663 of 37,536 keywords). This Maryville University is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Maryville University
Keyword details
Total words: 4,124
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst