Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martin Scorsese results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 922 hits . Analysis detected 4,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,946 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (8,935 of 35,607 keywords). This Martin Scorsese is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Martin Scorsese
Keyword details
Total words: 3,946
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 23.4% 23.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst