Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martin Scorsese results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 922 hits. Analysis detected 4,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,946 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (8,935 of 35,607 keywords). This Martin Scorsese is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Martin Scorsese
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
75%Martin Scorsese (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,946
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 23.4%23.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate