Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha And The Vandellas results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 1,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (23,929 of 37,536 keywords). This Martha And The Vandellas is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Martha And The Vandellas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠37%Martha And The Vandellas (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos