Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marsha Judkins results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 2,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,118 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (13,508 of 35,445 keywords). This Marsha Judkins is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Marsha Judkins
Keyword details
Total words: 2,118
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst