Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Weisbrot results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 4,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,375 of 37,536 keywords). This Mark Weisbrot is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Mark Weisbrot
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
91%Mark Weisbrot (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510091.0% percentile
7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 22.5%22.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 21.6%21.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.5%14.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Special Pleading: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos