Keyword summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Ruffalo results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61% saturation with 832 hits . Analysis detected 5,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,365 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,721 of 37,536 keywords). This Mark Ruffalo is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. Mark Ruffalo
Keyword details
Total words: 1,365
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.4% percentile 10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 61.0% 61.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 35.5% 35.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 25.5% 25.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 32.3% 32.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 61.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 35.5%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 32.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Straw Man: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 0.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst