Keyword summary
45%1 analyzed article/video1,495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Andrews results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 2,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,485 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,509 of 37,536 keywords). This Mark Andrews is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Mark Andrews
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
40%Mark Andrews (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,485
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 10.2%10.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos