Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maritime Forest results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,666 hits . Analysis detected 8,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,869 of 37,536 keywords). This Maritime Forest is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Maritime Forest
Keyword details
Total words: 12,772
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst