Keyword summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video731 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marina results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 584 hits. Analysis detected 2,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,193 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (10,768 of 37,536 keywords). This Marina is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Marina
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠72%Marina (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,193
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos