Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Maria Mudd Ruth results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 684 hits. Analysis detected 5,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,760 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 35,675 keywords). This Maria Mudd Ruth is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Maria Mudd Ruth
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Maria Mudd Ruth (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,760
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos