Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manhattan Institute results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 1,620 hits . Analysis detected 10,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,959 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,555 of 37,536 keywords). This Manhattan Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. Manhattan Institute
Keyword details
Total words: 4,959
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.9% percentile 6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 32.7% 32.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 18.5% 18.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.3% 27.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 32.7%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.3% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst