Keyword summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Male Labor Force Participation results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 237 hits . Analysis detected 1,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (18,363 of 55,169 keywords). This Male Labor Force Participation is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Male Labor Force Participation
Keyword details
Total words: 1,868
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst