Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Male Friendship results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 539 hits. Analysis detected 5,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (30,584 of 34,557 keywords). This Male Friendship is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Male Friendship
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
12%Male Friendship (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,316
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

12% percentile
025507510011.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos