Keyword summary
ā 98%1 analyzed article/video471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mald Decoy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 44.2% saturation with 625 hits. Analysis detected 3,092 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,413 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ā 91% (3,297 of 35,076 keywords). This Mald Decoy is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Mald Decoy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
ā 0%Running Back1%
ā 0%Javian Hawkins1%
ā 0%Atlanta Falcons1%
ā 0%Anthony Romano1%
ā 91%Mald Decoy (selected)8%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,413
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 44.2%44.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 44.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos