Keyword summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Make Up Artists And Hair Stylists Guild Awards results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Hindsight Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 319 faulty-reasoning hits from 652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (6,345 of 37,536 keywords). This Make Up Artists And Hair Stylists Guild Awards is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Make Up Artists And Hair Stylists Guild Awards
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510083.1% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles652 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos