Keyword summary
21%1 analyzed article/video718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maine State Housing Authority results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (39,550 of 54,231 keywords). This Maine State Housing Authority is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Maine State Housing Authority
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
28%Maine State Housing Authority (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510027.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos