Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Macarthur Foundation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 149 hits . Analysis detected 1,322 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,881 of 37,536 keywords). This Macarthur Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Macarthur Foundation
Keyword details
Total words: 2,240
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst