Keyword summary
98%2 analyzed articles/videos446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Russert results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 3,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,338 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,632 of 37,536 keywords). This Luke Russert is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Luke Russert
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
91%Luke Russert (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,338
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510090.3% percentile
7.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 19.7%19.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.5%20.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 21.5%21.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.3%18.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 10.5%10.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos