Keyword summary
ā 0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lsu Tigers results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 1,461 hits . Analysis detected 12,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,319 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ā 69% (11,693 of 37,536 keywords). This Lsu Tigers is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Lsu Tigers
Keyword details
Total words: 7,319
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.9% percentile 3.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst