Keyword summary
97%1 analyzed article/video943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Love And Sex results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.7% saturation with 1,293 hits. Analysis detected 5,918 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,829 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,206 of 37,536 keywords). This Love And Sex is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Love And Sex
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
81%Love And Sex (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,829
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 45.7%45.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 45.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos