Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Los Angeles World Cup Host Committee results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 723 hits. Analysis detected 2,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Los Angeles World Cup Host Committee is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Los Angeles World Cup Host Committee
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos