Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Protests results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 1,145 hits. Analysis detected 5,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,969 of 37,536 keywords). This Los Angeles Protests is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Protests
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Los Angeles Protests (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,129
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 27.7%27.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos