Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Mayoral Election results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,078 hits. Analysis detected 9,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,888 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Los Angeles Mayoral Election is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Mayoral Election
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 12,888
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos