Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Mayor Race results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 1,075 hits . Analysis detected 5,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Los Angeles Mayor Race is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Los Angeles Mayor Race
Keyword details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.6% 23.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst