Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles City Council results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 1,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,550 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (31,260 of 37,536 keywords). This Los Angeles City Council is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Los Angeles City Council
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,550
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos