Keyword summary
21% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Litter results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 547 hits . Analysis detected 5,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,980 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,542 of 37,536 keywords). This Litter is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Litter
Keyword details
Total words: 6,980
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst