Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lineage Fire results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 354 hits. Analysis detected 1,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,788 keywords). This Lineage Fire is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lineage Fire
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Lineage Fire (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos