Keyword summary
91%2 analyzed articles/videos517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lin Jian results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 3,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,590 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,507 of 37,536 keywords). This Lin Jian is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Lin Jian
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Lin Jian (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.2%21.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos