Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liberals results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 67.5% saturation with 1,913 hits . Analysis detected 8,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,835 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,566 of 34,832 keywords). This Liberals is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Liberals
Keyword details
Total words: 2,835
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.8% percentile 7.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 67.5% 67.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 33.5% 33.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 22.8% 22.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 18.8% 18.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 67.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 33.5%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst