Keyword summary
10%1 analyzed article/video1,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Libel results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 2,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,624 of 37,536 keywords). This Libel is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Libel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
11%Libel (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,492
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
025507510010.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos