Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lgbtq Agenda results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 227 hits . Analysis detected 1,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,629 of 37,536 keywords). This Lgbtq Agenda is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Lgbtq Agenda
Keyword details
Total words: 1,040
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.3% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.8% 21.8% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Middle Ground: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst