Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lewis Carroll results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 460 hits . Analysis detected 2,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,741 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,008 of 37,237 keywords). This Lewis Carroll is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Lewis Carroll
Keyword details
Total words: 3,741
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst