Keyword summary
3%1 analyzed article/video978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leslie Parker results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 593 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,934 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,304 of 37,536 keywords). This Leslie Parker is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Leslie Parker
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
1%Leslie Parker (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,934
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos