Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Len Kendall results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 1,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,178 keywords). This Len Kendall is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Len Kendall
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Len Kendall (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos