Keyword summary
6%3 analyzed articles/videos2,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legislative Session results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 3,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,072 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (34,226 of 34,833 keywords). This Legislative Session is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Legislative Session
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
2%Legislative Session (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,072
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate