Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Action results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 584 hits. Analysis detected 5,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,444 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,105 of 37,536 keywords). This Legal Action is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Legal Action
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Legal Action (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,444
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate