Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video1,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Smith results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 973 hits. Analysis detected 8,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,617 of 37,536 keywords). This Lee Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Lee Smith
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%Lee Smith (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510087.7% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 29.3%29.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.0%24.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.8%17.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 31.9%31.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 31.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos