Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Gelernt results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 883 faulty-reasoning hits from 228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48.4% and a BS Rank of 100% (25 of 37,536 keywords). This Lee Gelernt is worse (more manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group. Lee Gelernt
Keyword details
Total words: 228
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
100% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.9% percentile 48.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles228 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–125%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 100.0% 100.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 74.6% 74.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 58.8% 58.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 54.0% 54.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 38.2% 38.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% 120% 120% Framing Effect: Keyword 100.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 74.6%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 58.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 54.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 38.2%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst