Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Ann Womack results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 848 hits . Analysis detected 3,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,350 of 37,536 keywords). This Lee Ann Womack is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Lee Ann Womack
Keyword details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.7% 23.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.7%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst