Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leadership Change results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 963 hits . Analysis detected 4,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,540 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,533 of 37,536 keywords). This Leadership Change is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Leadership Change
Keyword details
Total words: 4,540
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 21.2% 21.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst