Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 226 hits . Analysis detected 1,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 735 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law
Keyword details
Total words: 735
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles735 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 30.8% 30.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 21.8% 21.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 30.8%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst