Keyword summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos7,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lausd results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 2,769 hits. Analysis detected 19,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,007 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (32,239 of 34,591 keywords). This Lausd is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Lausd
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
7%Lausd (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 26,007
Article count: 7
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles26K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate