Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Laura O'connell results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 462 hits. Analysis detected 3,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Laura O'connell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Laura O'connell
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Laura O'connell (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos