Keyword summary
75%1 analyzed article/video1,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Clery results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hindsight Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,867 of 37,536 keywords). This Laura Clery is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Laura Clery
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
48%Laura Clery (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos