Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video325 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Barron Lopez results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 1,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,557 of 37,536 keywords). This Laura Barron Lopez is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Laura Barron Lopez
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
64%Laura Barron Lopez (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos