Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lane Kiffin results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 74% saturation with 577 hits . Analysis detected 3,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of ā 99% (542 of 37,536 keywords). This Lane Kiffin is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Lane Kiffin
Keyword details
Total words: 780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.6% percentile 17.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles780 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0ā100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 74.0% 74.0% Fundamental Attribution E⦠Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 40.0% 40.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 38.0% 38.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 49.6% 49.6% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 22.2% 22.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 27.7% 27.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 18.5% 18.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Negativity Bias: Keyword 74.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 49.6%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 40.1%, sitewide 26.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 40.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 38.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 8.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 1.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 7.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 0.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst