Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lake Forest results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 988 hits. Analysis detected 5,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,833 keywords). This Lake Forest is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lake Forest
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Lake Forest (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos