Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lachman Fire results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 1,636 hits . Analysis detected 10,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,586 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,641 of 36,714 keywords). This Lachman Fire is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Lachman Fire
Keyword details
Total words: 8,586
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst