Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Trafficking results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 2,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 89% (3,924 of 35,319 keywords). This Labor Trafficking is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Labor Trafficking
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
89%Labor Trafficking (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 18.2%18.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos