Keyword summary
54%1 analyzed article/video970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Agreements results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 2,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,910 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (21,677 of 34,673 keywords). This Labor Agreements is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Labor Agreements
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
38%Labor Agreements (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,910
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos